Carl Sagan's Critical Thinking Class

Subscribe to Comments for "Carl Sagan's Critical Thinking Class"

Replies

G_Money's picture
Submitted by G_Money on

Since it's you, Doc:

Conversation with a friend:

Her: "You liked that Jorge Campillo guy's potential right?"
 
Me: "Yeah, before his arm got too damaged, I thought he was doing a fine job of proving a RH control freak with a ridiculously deceptive off-speed attack can still be a good ML pitcher even if he has a junk fastball."
 
Her: "Congrats, you just got him back as a bullpen arm.  Hello, Robert Manuel."
 
Getting the AA reliever of the year doesn't mean a whole lot in the scheme of things, but his last 2 seasons (2.5 if you take out a horrific start to 07 IIRC) are high quality stuff.  He didn't blink at AA or AAA, just kept killing em...in long relief.
I think Wlad's gonna be a decent-to-good player on the cheap, but he wasn't gonna be ours.  We don't like him.  So getting a piece we will use - a guy who can come in after Bedard and get some quick 1-2-3 innings will be a good thing.
I hope. ;)
~G

jemanji's picture
Submitted by jemanji on

Can't believe I missed the Popeye comp.

Wonder if Manuel has a change-speed game, do you know?

MyOhMyMariners's picture
Submitted by MyOhMyMariners on

Change up is his best pitch.  Hurts to say, but he his closest comp is Silva of 3 years ago.  NO walks, lots of fly balls.

jemanji's picture
Submitted by jemanji on

Carlos Silva had a good amount of ML value throughout his first six years. 

Sandy - Raleigh's picture
Submitted by Sandy - Raleigh on

I mentioned before that much of my value in analysis for the Ms was due to NOT having the emotional attachment of fandom.  (and as I feel that dispassion wane, I understand the dangers).  Of course, this is why when I get a little giddy with slapping myself on the back for my insight, I always try to slap myself on the face, too.

Recently I noted the Ms are overloaded with catcher talent, making ANY catcher in the fold expendable, (cay Clement).

I mentioned recently that somewhere in the mix of Z trades, a bullpen arm would likely be coming.  (welcome aboard Robert Manuel).

I mentioned 3-4 years ago that Snell had the stuff to become the most dominant pitcher of the generation.  (before I knew anything about his depression issues).  I reached on that, but maintain that he's got the "stuff" to become a top 10 pitcher.  All he needs is a team where he can have FUN coming to the ballpark with.

Spectator's picture
Submitted by Spectator on

Time for a note on the 3rd-round pick (after Ackley, Franklin, Baron and Poythress), who maybe will always be known as the other LH guy from UNC.

I wanted to highlight his stats, but I found video of he and Ackely that is pretty interesting (same game, same camera angle):

Seager:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=61UCpfx5i28

Ackley:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cAAbgx5BOg0

Seager is only 5-10, so he makes Ackely look big at 6-1.

Anyway, so far Seager has been getting hits like crazy in low-A ball in his first 10 games:

36 AB, 15 H, 5 BB, 3 K, 1 double, 1 HR, 2 SB

.417/.465/.528

Playing 3b at Clinton, but was drafted as a 2b and was said to be likely to stick there, which is his ideal spot given he's not expected to hit for much power. 

G_Money's picture
Submitted by G_Money on

The Seager footage really does clarify what I thought was Seager's power problem in college.

 

Both Ackley and Seager have a lack of loading that can be worked on.  Ackley has the faster bat, but if you watch Seager's hands and shoulders, he doesn't load AT ALL.  He just brings the bat forward. 

No obliques, no hands, no shoulders.  His swing is anti-power.  If he has to do that because his bat can't catch up to fast pitching with slower wood bats, that's fine, he'll never have power.  but some hand-load and torque would do a lot to fix his punch-n-judy approach.

Now, I said the same thing about Mangini needing to fix his hip weight-shift in order to find some power, and he's either never done it or I was flat wrong about that being his issue.

But it does look to me like a correctable problem that's creating Seager's lack of power.  His body's not topped out - it's his pre-swing that's preventing him from accessing everything he has.

Lookin forward to seeing if he can find a little pop as he comes up through the system, or if Bloomquist is his upper range.

I think it's the former, which makes it fun. :)

~G

 

jemanji's picture
Submitted by jemanji on

My first concern in seeing a guy who goes to his "pepper" swing, on an 0-0 count, is I wonder if he doesn't believe that he belongs in the batter's box.

No idea whether this applies to Seager.  But I hate seeing a guy be that passive (in terms of what he's trying to accomplish) against pitchers who are a lot worse than the ones he'll be facing later on...

Agreed.  When you see a guy who isn't loading, it's intriguing to wonder what he'd do if he just put a little hip into it.

Leave a Reply

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.