John Lackey Rumor

Subscribe to Comments for "John Lackey Rumor"

Replies

Taro's picture
Submitted by Taro on

Lackey is pretty solid mechanically, although the curve worries me slightly. 

For some reason I thought he had an elbow injury earlier in the year (which scared me off big time)? Forearm/bicep strains aren't that serious.

I actually like him. Good mechanics, proven AL #1-2, and not rediculously old in a buyer's market. It comes down to how high the $+years get, but I like him if he comes at decent value.

 

SABR Matt's picture

That's about as high as I'd want to go for Lackey.  It would still leave the Mariners about 16-20 million dollars to buy a DH and possibly a LF...and it, along with a Hernandez extension, would lock in a viscious 1-2 in the Mariner rotation for 4 years.  With those guys 1-2, you can have all the cheap, high risk high reward experiments and spaghetti strands you want filling the rest of the rotation.

jemanji's picture
Submitted by jemanji on

I just love ballclubs that have multiple dominators at the top of the rotation.  If I have a personal bias, it's that one.

The Angels have posted some 100-ish team OPS's, but they've had marquee TOR's.   The 2001 M's lost to a ballclub that had superior TOR's.   I just think that big-time aces are the fabric of World Series history.

Taro's picture
Submitted by Taro on

I'm wondering if he can be had for 4-5 years at $12-14mil?

His last two years have been cut short IPs wise (which should depress his value), but he was a 5.5-6.0 WAR type a few years ago.

Its a pretty nice time for Lackey to be hitting the market from a buyer's stanpoint. The market is low and his stock probably isn't as high as it should be.

jemanji's picture
Submitted by jemanji on

The word is that Lackey is irritated about the two hometown discounts that he cut the Royals and "now it's time to be paid" (as though the zeroes on the paychecks haven't been much so far).

Don't know if that's the case, but ... it'll be a whale of a contest between Lackey's attitude, the fact that he's such a huge acquisition, and the market.

My guess would be that if only 2 or 3 players got sensational contracts, he'd be one of them, but ... after the Jack Wilson scenario I've given up guessing contracts.  :- )

Leave a Reply

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.