Ian Snell Joins M's; Game On

Subscribe to Comments for "Ian Snell Joins M's; Game On"

Replies

jemanji's picture
Submitted by jemanji on

Did you spend your waiver position on Snell?  :- )

Taro's picture
Submitted by Taro on

Well, took over a last place team in an AL-only keeper league this year (hence the #1 pick) and am comfortably in first place in the standings. I'm going to save it for Jake Peavy, and maybe swap him for a keeper bat thats out of the running.

If Peavy wasn't traded I would have gone for Snell. If I were in danger of not making the playoffs I might have gone with Snell anyways. I wish I could watch Snell start a game before choosing, but Peavy is probably the pick for me in my situation.

okdan's picture
Submitted by okdan on

Hey Doc,

These deadline moves from Dr. Z remind me of what you often say with regard to Billy Beane's Athletics. I'm gonna mis-quote here, but it's something like "You play the first 1/3 of the season with what you've got, the next 1/3 with some adjustments, and the last 1/3 with the players you actually want."

Looks to me like this is the exact same way Dr. Z is looking at his group of guys.

jemanji's picture
Submitted by jemanji on

That hadn't occurred.  :daps:

Beane says, "One-third watching them play, one-third trying to get what you want, one-third playing with what you want."

Isn't that something.  Great call.

M's Watcher's picture
Submitted by M's Watcher on

Doc,

I think you missed this.  Sure, if you are looking ahead to 2010 and no guarantee of Wash's return, Snell is a good option to replace him in the rotation.  But for 2009, the potential for a huge improvement in the rotation is lost with the Wash trade.  Now the rotation looks like Felix, Snell, and God-knows-what, at least until Bedard is whole (if ever).

Leave a Reply

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.