You are here

Gotta wear shades

Replies

Taro's picture
Submitted by Taro on

I would love to lock Lee up depending on the terms.

The Ms aren't exactly loaded with SP talent in the minors and a durable lefty killer like Lee is a perfect fit for our situation.

My only concern is the cutter.. but Lee has good mechanics and doesn't supinate any of his other pitches.

misterjonez's picture
Submitted by misterjonez on

I would imagine it will happen. Meaning, I would guess that he's re-signed.

Agree on our lack of depth in starting pitching. Locking up 10+ WAR in your 1-2 punch makes the rest of the roster assembly quite a bit simpler in the coming years.

jemanji's picture
Submitted by jemanji on

Seems I read that Lee and the Phils were talking 3/$58-60m.

In the words of Sinjin Smythe, "sounds quite reasonable!" I wonder if the M's could sweet-talk Lee into 4 x $18m with no-trades etc etc.

They can expand payroll a bit as the playoff money comes rolling in and the attendance flies past 3 million.

Taro's picture
Submitted by Taro on

Halladay got pretty much something around there though right?

I wonder if 4/$70 or 3/$55 does it? I'd definetly back a deal like that. :-)

misterjonez's picture
Submitted by misterjonez on

reasonable deals that he'd agree to. He might want vesting options and other stuff that makes it possible for him to get the vaunted $100m mark, which I'd be perfectly fine with. It's not like his pitcher *profile* ages terribly, the only risk is you wake up one morning and his shoulder decided to give up the ghost.

Taro's picture
Submitted by Taro on

A vesting option for 230 IPs or whatever in the final year would be fine by me.. Something unlikely to vest like Figgins' 5th year.

jemanji's picture
Submitted by jemanji on

Two years ago we'd have been forlornly talking about $125, $150m deals.

As you have often noted, Taro, the market is way down. About 20-30% this winter, and maybe more than that in terms of years.

Lee is one tough hombre. Him and Felix 1-2 and the M's are instantly legit, Capt Jack's other coups aside.

Taro's picture
Submitted by Taro on

Halladay's deal pretty much set the market for Lee:

3 years/$60M (2011-13), plus 2014 option
11:$20M, 12:$20M, 13:$20M, 14:$20M option
2014 option guaranteed with all of the following:
225 IP in 2013,
415 IP in 2012-13, and
Halladay is not on disabled list at end of 2013 season

As good as Lee is, hes not Halladay.. If you can negotiate him down $2-3mil per year from Halladay's deal, thats a pretty nice contract for both sides. 3 or 4 years gauranteed would be fine. :-)

KingCorran's picture

Will Seattle sign both Lee and Gonzalez to rich extensions when they've already got so much cash tied up in the Ichiro-Felix-Figgins trifecta?

If not... who gets the cash?

jemanji's picture
Submitted by jemanji on

The M's have a LOT of unspent payroll in the speedloader, but yeah, thass' ay prow-blem...

$18m to Felix and Lee, the same to AGone and Ichiro, $9m to Figgins, that's $80m on five players, very well spent.

The rest is going to be going to Scrubs. You build around those five vets, then you're going to be using Ackley, RRS, Fister, Saunders, Tui, Moore, etc etc down the rest of the way.

Have not seen somebody pencil out what the payroll would have to be, to extend Lee and also bring in AGone. But the M's have been in on Gonzalez, right? Maybe that's why they're pinching pennies even on a $4-5m Washburn deal?

KingCorran's picture

I definitely think $80M would be well spent on that core. However, will the M's agree? I think we have the parts to put around them... but you have to admit, kicking the budget back up to $120M so that we have even $40 MM to fill out the team (including Gutierrez...) makes for a thin budget with little margin for error.

I'd take the risk. But I don't see the M's FO doing so... at least, I'm not confident that they will. I hope so!

jemanji's picture
Submitted by jemanji on

You've got production locked in, from your 1-2 SP's and 1-2-4 hitters, and you're resigned to using young players elsewhere.

You pick the wrong young players, you swap them out. It's the Civics way that forces you not to make errors :- )

Taro's picture
Submitted by Taro on

Theres almost no way a Gonzalez extension works out for anyone either than Gonzalez himself and Boras.

Count me in as WAY against a rediculous extension for Gonzalez.

I'd be open to trading for him and keeping him for the next 2 years, but it depends on the cost. I'm guessing offering 3 non-elite prospects (like the Lee trade) won't get it done. If thats the case there are just far cheaper alternatives avalialbe and a loaded 1B offseason just a year away.

Leave a Reply

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <ul> <ol> <li> <i> <b> <img> <table> <tr> <td> <th> <div> <strong> <p> <br> <u>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.