A day after we gave him the golfclap, Baker with an even more fascinating report -- that both the Mariners and Phillies valued Tyson Gillies more highly than they valued Michael Saunders.
The cognitive dissonance is Dr. D's this morning, lads :- ) Is 'cause I believe the following, with high degrees of conviction:
.......
Belief 1. Michael Saunders is one of the 25 best ML-ready prospects in baseball right now
Belief 2. Tyson Gillies is nowhere near the M's top 10, much less baseball's top 100
Belief 3. Veteran ML tools scouts and GM's know what they're doing -- the more so when they unanimously agree across organizations
Belief 4. The M's offered Saunders in a 3-for-1 and were told no thanks, that Tyson Gillies is "the key to the deal" (above Phillippe Aumont)
Rationalization? I haven't got one.
I'll tell you what does NOT ease my cognitive dissonance: the suggestion that Saunders doesn't have a short-term role in Philly -- therefore would burn club-controls time doing nothing. Are you going to pass on Neftali Perez and take a Grade B- player from class A baseball because you already have bullpen arms?
.
=== Can't Undersell the Mick ===
Michael Saunders was graded the #4 prospect in the PCL by Baseball America this winter.
That's right behind Travis Snider, and right ahead of Alcides Escobar and Brett Wallace.
The only players ahead of Saunders: Snider, and that Neftali Perez guy who smoked about 18 batters per nine innings in the AL, and Buster Posey, "the next Johnny Bench."
.....................
The only rationalization I can conceive: that in his ML trial, Saunders was "exposed" as a player who will never hit.
Tough to believe. Saunders has a snake-tongue bat. He turned around 97 fastballs into his power alley. But...
.
=== Gillies' Topside Ain't Much ===
I don't say this lightly, but it's not feasible to reconcile it by saying that Tyson Gillies is one of the top 100 prospects in baseball.
Gillies is a slap-hitting leadoff guy. His ceiling is known, and it's not a high one. He is a looonnnnnnng ways from posting .380 OBP's in the American League, and if he ever does, he's still not an impact player.
.
=== Aumont the #2 Player in the Deal? Wow ===
I don't know what the reconciliation is. I do know I'll bet you a $2 bill that Tyson Gillies does not have the ML career that Michael Saunders has.
It also means, by the way, that from where the MLB teams sit, the Mariners gave a whale of a lot for Cliff Lee's walk year. Phillippe Aumont was the #2 player in the deal, and Juan Ramirez the #3. The first player in the deal was > Saunders.
That means that from their point of view -- not yours, theirs! -- the M's gave up an Erik Bedard package, less two throwins.
- > Saunders = Jones
- Aumont = Tillman
- J.C. Ramirez = Butler... no, Ramirez is better than Butler; = Sherrill
- Butler and the big fringe reliever: I'll give you that one
For a guy in his walk year! I take it this means the M's will be v-e-r-y interested in extending Cliff Lee.
.
=== MENSA Puzzle Dept. ===
Forgetting the cognitive dissonance for me, this presents an amazing contradiction for Baseball America (and every comparable prospects-list site out there).
John Sickels didn't have Gillies in his M's top 20. USS Mariner, currently, has Gillies as a future 1.0 WAR outfielder -- virtually the lowest ranking he could have, and be in their org top 40. It goes on and on.
Yet the best sources -- the M's and Phillies -- treat Gillies as though he's one of the 50 best prospects in baseball.
It's a cool little puzzle. :- )
Cheers,
Dr D

