You are here

Damon at 1 x $5-$7 million?

Replies

M's Watcher's picture
Submitted by M's Watcher on

seems to be falling in our lap.  The biggest difference between the noodle arm and Crawford is that apparently Johnny is a cheap FA now and Crawford will cost us more to obtain.  At this price, I take Damon's bat and throw a late inning defender into LF.  I like the lineup with him in 2010 and that he's only a short term fix. 

jemanji's picture
Submitted by jemanji on

for anything similar to, say, the Cliff Lee package, then I'll take the guy who helps us now and later...

But assuming that Tampa wants a ransom for him, Damon can help now...

Late-inning replacements when ahead 5-3 are definitely part of the package, as is Jack Wilson running 200 feet into the OF to take relays.  Anybody remember Gorman Thomas throwing the ball literally underhand from LF?  Mostly the SS just ran out to take the ball...

SABR Matt's picture

This is why Zduriencik has been playing possum with the free agents.  He could have signed Nick Johnson for 8 mil/2 years or Bay for a king's ransom or (etc)...but he read the market correctly and recognized that there would be someone left standing when the music stopped in desperate need of a contract who could help the line-up.  I hope he follows through and actually signs Damon...if he ends up in Oakland...he instantly makes them a contender...can't let that happen.

G_Money's picture
Submitted by G_Money on

I do not like Damon.  I hate the way he plays the field and I find him obnoxious personally even if he can still swing a bat.

But I could say the same thing about Milton Bradley, and for the price I was quite happy to add him to our lineup.

Damon gives us what, 4-5 RC/27 over his actual, on-roster replacement?  For the 15-whatever million a year he wanted, at his age over multiple years?  Not really in our plans.  For 5-7 million on a one year deal?  That's how contenders get minted, by getting great production values on their dollars and having legit bats in the lineup. 

This is a play that could pay significant dividends this year, and has no long-term downside.  I'd like to see us jump on it.

~G

csiems's picture
Submitted by csiems on

Anything that keeps Bradley off the field and in the DH spot without screwing the team over at the plate is a great thing for this team. There is hidden value in this move in that it increases the chance that Bradley stays healthy all year.

jemanji's picture
Submitted by jemanji on

:- ) Bill James always wrote that he expected a good ML manager to surprise him with moves, and for those moves to turn out to be right, later on ...

If that is what Zduriencik has done, anticipate this syndrome of screaming deals going to the buyers (rather than to the sellers) at the end of the winter, I'll give him credit for master-class maneuvering on that front ...

Listening to Zduriencik on the radio, there is no question that he can (and usually does) politely walk away from deals that he doesn't like... he has been walking away from DOZENS of firm offers this winter, and he may be about to reap the benefits of his willingness to say no...

Leave a Reply

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <ul> <ol> <li> <i> <b> <img> <table> <tr> <td> <th> <div> <strong> <p> <br> <u>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.