Larry Stone with a column out, this one on the MVP vote.
It was Bill James who pointed out that when a Hall of Fame vote is taken on a top-echelon player, such as Roger Clemens, the discussion afterwards will consist of arguing about why he wasn't unanimous. Or first-ballot. Or whatever.
He pointed out acidly, so we've reached the point at which the Hall of Fame can no longer honor a great player. It can only insult him.
.................
Par is a good score in golf, they say. Being voted into the Hall of Fame is a good score. Getting an MVP award is a good score. It doesn't really have to be unanimous: being the best player in the best league is the top o' the mountain.
..................
Picture Ichiro's batting average on a guy who hits 30 homers and draws 80-90 walks. Amazing.
Mauer's .365 AVG, .444 OBP, and .587 SLG led to a 170 OPS+. Did you know that between the ages of 22 and 39, Ted Williams had three seasons just like Mauer's 2009, and that they were the only three lousy seasons of his career?
Picture a guy who had three years like that -- a 170 OPS+ -- and those were the years he went home and wept all winter long.
..................
Stone also opines that Cabrera's late-season partying should have cost him MVP votes. Does SSI agree?
Well, most pro athletes party, and many of them party in ways that, if you knew about them in their entirety, would cause you to stop rooting for the players. Cabrera, by getting drunk during the season, is hardly unique.
But there is a line there. Shawn Kemp was excoriated for drinking during the NBA Finals, not because he was the only one doing it -- but because Shawn was reportedly less concerned about winning than most NBA players are. His drinking was only a reflection of that general attitude.
With his column, Stone seems to be saying that Cabrera is one of those ballplayers who just wants to bank his jack, shag the ladies and go home. The 7:00 show for the suckers is fine if it doesn't get in the way of the other stuff. .... some guys are like that. Is Cabrera?
Zduriencik and Wakamatsu work very hard at getting "character players" and in many cases, that's code for "players who care whether they win or not." A lot of guys don't. Wakamatsu's, in 2009, did.
...................
Interesting that Ben Zobrist, who led MLB in "Wins Above Replacement," got no vote higher than 6th. I definitely would not line up my MVP vote according to Stone's priorities, but don't deny that his own priorities have value.
....................
Kendry Morales was #5 in the vote, delivering a .569 SLG and being the best hitter on a team that won its division. It's nice to see a Cuban super-talent deliver, and Morales definitely put in the work.
The Angels made him work for it. Maybe that is the key? If you're going to invest in a Cuban star going from poverty-and-squallor and make him a rich man in America, maybe you need to snap him back to reality on the ballfield and make him grind for his playing time.
Perhaps the team that signs Aroldis Chapman needs to put him on the slow track.
........................
James has always insisted that the search for baseball Truth, includes the consideration of that information that goes beyond the scope of baseball statistics.
The MVP voting contains interesting information. Players who help their ballclubs in ways not captured by WAR show up in MVP voting. This factor is also valued by Jack Zduriencik.
Cheers,
Dr D

