You are here

Adam Dunn

Replies

TAD's picture
Submitted by TAD on

It does indeed seem to me that Mike Wilson has recently developed a drastically different approach at the plate.  It's as if he is stalking the pitcher and willing to take more pitches per at bat.  It could be that something just clicked for him after witnessing the way Ackley at West Tenn approaches an at bat and even to some degree the patience of Brad Nelson here at Tacome.  That being said it would be nice if he could square up a few more balls - like he did in 2009 at spring training.

But one thing Mike Wilson does have that Adam Dunn doesn't is speed.  Throughout his minor league career he has been able to put us some decent SB totals, but he may have slowed down a little in that area with the multiple pulled muscles in his legs a few years back.  As big as Mike is, I would think the M's would attempt to move him to 1st, which would free him up from chasing after balls in the outfield thereby taking some of the load/stress off his legs

It would be nice to see a few power bats finally break thru in the next couple of yrs.  Outside of Bucky Jacobsen when was the last time a power bat made any sort of splash???

You would think that Dr Marcus Elliot's exercise program would be tailored made for Mike Wilson - transfer his physical power so that it translates into more explosive rotational power. 

It would be nice to know what sort of actual performance Metrics the M's and Dr Elliot are using to determine the success of this "Rotational Mechanics" strengthening program.  Or even receive some sort of anecdotal feedback from some of these veteran minor leaguers such as Mike Wilson to see if they feel if its been beneficial.

moe's picture
Submitted by moe on

Greg Luzinski, back in the late 80's had some terrific years.  WAY good.  But even his less that career-type years were of great value.  Thats what we could see, as a topside, out of Wilson. Look at '79-'81 and '83 for the Bull.  He was past his prime....certainly.  But over those seasons he was a .250-.350-..465ish type of player.  Tom Brunansky in the Mid 80's was a bit less than that.  From '84-'85 he was a .245-.320.-455 tyype of guy...and hit 59 taters.   Those aren't even Dunn numbers...but they are still dang valuable.  Interestingly...we we're willing to pay $4 million for Kotchman, partially because those type of numbers were his upside.  Wilson is free.  Junior's upside (outside of the clubhouse) was those type of numbers....well even less.  Wilson is free.

Heck,  He may just crash and burn.  That's probably as likely as Brunansky type numbers...But you know what you can't get out of Langerhans....and options cedrtianly aren't a concern with Wilson.  If he's a hack...let him go.  But let's find out.

Remember Joe Charboneau?  Some of us do.  Couldn't hit a lick in the high minors...had one great year in Cleveland.  '80, I think.  Flash in the pan, I suppose.  But wouldnd't you take Luzinski type numbers from Wilson for the next 160 games?

Wilson could be somewhere in there. It's possible.  Langerhans won't. 

jemanji's picture
Submitted by jemanji on

And everybody seems to kinda wave off the fact that he was THIS close to making Wakamatsu's first M's team.  That means that he was, in a sense, the org's #1 ML-ready prospect at that time.

Going to take a look and mosh off your thoughts, if y'don't mind...

Leave a Reply

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <ul> <ol> <li> <i> <b> <img> <table> <tr> <td> <th> <div> <strong> <p> <br> <u>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.