You are here

Adam Dunn

Replies

SABR Matt's picture
Submitted by SABR Matt on

Agreed with that post. Still think B-Ref comps are illogical and silly. But if you composite enough of them, the picture does become pretty clear. I don't see Dunn is a risky pick at all. And I don't get this attitude of "well if we sign Dunn we cog the DH spot and our prospects won't have a place to play!"

Um...Dunn IS our prospects. When they're all grown up and good. I mean if Jeff Clement turns into Adam Dunn some day...we'd be thrilled. If we sign Dunn and Clement can't stick at C...you can try him at 1B or let Dunn stick a glove on that giant hand of his and pretend to be a fielder...who cares...it's first base!

Sandy - Raleigh's picture
Submitted by Sandy - Raleigh on

I wouldn't object to signing Dunn in general. But, I would have to know the money and terms of the contract before putting forth my assessment of the short-term AND long-term ramifications of such a signing.

In general, I completely agree with Matt, that given the team mix, a player like Dunn would be a plus the team with potential side benefits nearly impossible to measure. I also agree with Matt that the Ichiro-ness of Seattle over the past 4 years has likely increased the fan-based distaste for TTO hitters, so they'll be extremely frustrated with him unless he gets out of the gate VERY quickly.

Mostly, though, I'm still convinced the club is better off long-term to let the crops bloom and THEN buy the imports, (I'm working on an article to go into this more fully, but it'll be next year before it hits the web).

I see an "inefficiency" in the basic concept of - plug DH -- THEN see if Clement works out at catcher, and if not, move him to 1B -- and if THAT doesn't work out - move Dunn to 1B and Clement to DH -- and if THAT doesn't work out .....

Me? I'd rather get the answer on Clement and Rob Johnson *FIRST*. Whatever that answer happens to be, it simplifies the entire "which FA to get" concept based on "knowing" which spots are (or are not) covered.

jemanji's picture
Submitted by jemanji on

++Um…Dunn IS our prospects. When they’re all grown up and good++

LOL :- )

And that kinda sounded like a Padna quote. Guess he's getting us all trained.

jemanji's picture
Submitted by jemanji on

++ I wouldn’t object to signing Dunn in general. But ...++

Sandy, can you hear yourself talk?

If I didn't know better, I'd start to suspect that you're becoming a Mariners fan...

...........

++ Mostly, though, I’m still convinced the club is better off long-term to let the crops bloom and THEN buy the imports ++

That certainly gives you the advantage of "agility" ... in chess, "piece mobility" ... with respect to year 3 or 4.

At cost. It slides the emphasis heavily away from years 1 and 2. Which is fine, if that's what you want to do.

Agility, scalability, integratability :- ) etc etc etc, all are important principles. As with a well-played game of chess, no one principle can be an absolute, but all must be taken into consideration.

SABR Matt's picture
Submitted by SABR Matt on

I don't think clogging ONE position with a long term contract is going to change the agility equation much...even if it is DH.

One wonders is Zduriencik is keeping in mind that this is an AL club and we need 9 bats, not just 8. :)

Leave a Reply

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <ul> <ol> <li> <i> <b> <img> <table> <tr> <td> <th> <div> <strong> <p> <br> <u>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.