SSI HOT SEAT -- mini Padres 6

Long-awaited roooolllll out


Hot seat, in which Dr. D gives his scattergun reaction to news of the day.  No thinking allowed.  

It's like Lonnie of MC had a Skype podcast rollin' on us.  Time to skip to the good stuff!  No stats.  No facts.  No supporting evidence, especially none of that egghead F/X baloney.  No wit and most importantly no wisdom.  In fact:  no baseball knowledge.  Just the sound bytes.

This is the American Idol generation.  It's got to pop Pop POP!


HOT SEAT:  Blake Beavan throws two solid, and nobody squares up a thing.  New angle, says Beavan.  Watch me do what Fister did.

DR. D, KNEE JERK:  We got this big round filing cabinet with the word "Noise" scrawled on the side of it in Sharpie.  We crumple this type of newspaper clipping loosely, and flip it over there no-look.  If it rims out, it stays on the carpet.

Beavan already had an average angle and average movement.  Maybe this will change his angle to "slightly above average;" more likely it will just foul up his shoulder.  

Yeah, that's P90X city baby:  take your one good point and just work THAT.  Forget about the weaknesses.  Go with what brung ya.

Beavan's problem has never been his fastball.  His problem is everything else.

Fister gets minimal, minimal, say it with me MIN..ani-MAL, benefit from the angle on his fastball as such.  He's good because he's good -- changeup, yakker and all the trimmings -- and also because his release point is about two feet closer than batters think.  He gets an invisible four feet on his heater.

Jeremy Bonderman gets insane movement on his fastball.  A moving fastball doesn't make you a hard-case, dude.

The angle doesn't HURT none.  But you're looking for love in all the wrong places.  It's like saying hey, I'm gonna throw my changeup like Carter Capps throws his changeup.  I'm a baaaad man.  

Yer kinda missin' the point on your idol there. 


HOT SEAT:  Danny Hultzen blows away the mini-Padres with eight (reportedly) precision-located pitches.

Dr. D:  We told you that you might hear this ANY morning.  As it turned out, you heard it on the FIRST morning.  Comparatively speaking, hearing it on the FIRST morning is preferable, as compared to if we'd heard it on the SEVENTH morning.

He's not a guarantee.  He's now, ooohhhhhhhhhhhh .... say a 70% chance.  Of being Deuce Blinkin' Hultzen.


HOT SEAT:  Taijuan "hits upper 90's."

Dr. D:  After one morning, we are feeling tremendous remorse over the Joe Saunders signing.  At least we don't have to get all invested in Garland and Bonderman...

... Can you pull a wry face on a Skype audio?

Given another four sharp outings by Hultzen ... How 'bout you take Saunders, Garland, and Bonderman, Eric.  I'll take Erasmo, Taijuan, and Hultzen.  Play you a series for your paycheck?


Seriously.  Baseball is so encumbered by tradition -- "tradition" in the worst sense of the word, doing things the wrong way, even though we KNOW it's the wrong way, for the reason that we've always done it that way.


HOT SEAT:  Kameron Loe, according to Baker, "will make the team" if he throws like he did his first time out.

Dr. D:  How many of these guys are Blake Beavan plus a million or six dollars in wages?  Never has one man been passed up so fast by so many people for so little reason.

Well, the Seahawks are revolutionizing the NFL by creating competition at every position.  I read it on the net.



Klat Categories: 


May look like the mistake in a week? A month? I thought it was all along, so I'm asking how long it might take for that to be a more prevalent opinion. Not expecting average fans to see it that way though. They tend to only want veterans.

"How 'bout you take Saunders, Garland, and Bonderman, Eric. I'll take Erasmo, Taijuan, and Hultzen. Play you a series for your paycheck?"

Beautiful. Just perfect.


CMB's picture


At least this team finally has some options. The lack of depth we've previously had was depressing. To me, it's a great problem to have. How many teams have kept the same 5 the whole season anyway?


Yes, please.

Charlie Gordon


To start out, in my opinion. I just would have preferred Beaven, Paxton, Walker, Maurer, Bonderman and Garland fighting for the spot you have Saunders in.

It's definitely a good problem unless Saunders isn't one of the 5 best, since they can't trade him until the end of June. The chances that he was going to be one of the 5 best never looked good to me.


Have a lot of nagging injuries in their recent history, obviously Bonderman and Garland are coming off big layoffs. Paxton had his hip problem. That's a big role of the dice.


You've got a point, but I see Beaven as entirely adequate without any improvement to a pitch. We're talking about 13 options to start, not the usual 7 or 8. There's way more depth than I can recall ever seeing any team have in the rotation. One more didn't change there being depth, that was already the position. The only thing it added was a mediocre proven MLB veteran. You can argue that there's a need for that, but starting options we already had aplenty.


If Taijuan looks great, as he did first time, and Deuce Hultzen looks fixed, as he did first time, and Paxton looks good, as he apparently did ... well, it's only one game* but it's one game that Z wasn't able to see when making his offseason decisions.

Not busting his chops over offseason hedge bets.

If he STICKS WITH the meatballs, after he sees that he's got lasagna primavera, we'll bust his chops at that point, b'lee DAT


Unlikely that GMZ abandons J Saunders until the 1/2 way point. But the wookies looking good hopefully prevents GMZ from carrying either Bonderman or Garland into the season. Jack is all about quality back-up and lots of depth this year -- he got burned last year with offensive holes at 1B, DH, OF due to lack of quality depth & it is not going to happen again.


If Saunders is running a 100 ERA+ and is on a 1-year deal Terry then --- > you'd think for sure that they could get a piece of some value, right?

LOVING the fact that we're talking about shedding Saunders before he ever appears in a spring game.  HEH


What's PHX stand for Terry?


Love to see Hultzen open the year in the five hole, and then see Saunders cashed at the trade deadline and the next kid brought up. Whoever heard of having more than enough qualified starting pitchers? Do the Royals have problems like this? What do they do with Beaven? He's a pretty good pitcher. They can't just give him away.


ghost's picture


The buzz from Baker and the Mariner personnel is that the club thinks Maurer is the closest to being a finished product, not Hultzen/Paxton who they believe can still learn something in AAA.

I expect to see the big three all in Tacoma this year pitching together just as they were all in AA last year pitching together in the first half. If I had a guess, I'd say we are going to go with Felix/Iwakuma/Saunders/Ramirez/Maurer and Beavan will be the first fall-back to Maurer if he struggles.


Kite's picture


Pinpoint fastball, breaking ball for strikes, and aggressive beyond belief. He's easily the most polished prospect in the system. I don't think he should start the season though, too much at stake to ignore his potential delivery issues. A month or two in Tacoma making sure he's (mostly) consistent start to start is all he really needs at this point, and get the extra year too.

Walker showed why his upside is so high, but he's still "throwing" too much vs. "pitching." He doesn't know where his stuff is going, and he seems to lack an elite strike-out pitch, especially when he can't control the curve. His new cutter isn't a K pitch, and his change-up isn't MLB ready. He's too young to go back to his slider. He's still a good year away, at least, he needs to get that curve working and build confidence in his change-up.

Paxton...what's up with his arm? 89-90 mph? Hopefully just early Spring issues. He still has command issues, but his 3 pitch mix is good enough to play in the MLB, as long as he can control his fastball. I see him coming up after Saunders gets shipped off at the deadline, or after the 1st injury after Hultzen goes up, if he learns to control a bit better.

Maurer...what a revelation. Easy 94, touch 96, his arm is as good as Walker's, but his stuff is too hit-able. A sub 8 K/9 in AA is not going to translate, I don't care how hard you throw it. He needs to take a big step forward this year before he becomes anything more than a potential MOR guy.


It's all about the innings. There isn't a single one of the big four that will throw 200 innings in 2013. The big 3 might not get more than 150. Nobody knows how Iwakuma will handle the FTE pitching load come August. And that means Saunders is a virtual lock to spend the entire season in Seattle.


ghost's picture


Doc can vent his frustration with the slow pace that Z uses to develop pitchers he doesn't intend on trading, but, to me, it's perfectly legitimate to take care of your talents even if it sacrifices a little bit from the current long as you're building toward something real in the very near future.


then there's Beaven, Noesi, Garland and Bonderman to pick from in a rotation headed by Felix, Iwakuma and Ramirez. 2 of those guys to maybe cover 4-8 starts to close out the season unless it's a year for postseason play too. Sure Iwakuma and Ramirez were under 140 IP last year too, there's no way to be sure how it will all play out. So go to a 6 man rotation with Felix skipping around to stay on 5 days. Him, Saunders and Beaven were all well over 140 innings last year. The way they've added depth maybe it should be an 8 man rotation.


Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <ul> <ol> <li> <i> <b> <img> <table> <tr> <td> <th> <div> <strong> <p> <br> <u>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.


Please log in or create an account to post shouts.
moethedogYankees have made a move and TB is hot. We need to make a bat move that makes sense. But then....we needed to make it 30+ games ago. Sigh...3 min 29 sec ago
moethedogAnd Hart is showing no signs of a mashing life. None. It's hard for me to see it starting soon. I wish it were different, Rick but Hart's my first guy gone if we swap for a bat. He's not hitting and he can't field.6 min 30 sec ago
SABR Mattrick...problem is, we are losing something. Hart is a bad defensive first baseman...possibly worse post-injuries. Smoak and Morrison are both ++fielders30 min 14 sec ago
rick82Moe: the reason I would put Hart at first is because he has a documented record as a masher, whereas Smoak and Morrison don't. They all pretty much equally suck right now, but Hart is the only one I see with any "upside" - he looks old now, but I remember Ibanez looking old early last season, and Swisher looked old to us earlier this season. I don't trust "looking old" - if a kid was hitting like Hart is (Romero?), we'd probably just say he isn't ready or lacks the skills. Hart has displayed all the skills at the ML level, he's just not doing it now. If Hart replaces our first basemen,we aren't losing anything offensively, and we might get the rust off.44 min 35 sec ago
bsrRe Montero (and Kelly) I think Z has proven pretty good at sorting out who deserves a promotion to the bigs (and is reasonably willing to pull the plug on anyone who is not performing). I am operating under the assumption that these guys are not up yet because Z doesn't think their performance will translate to MLB (at least not on balance, w/ all other factors and risks considered). Not because of culture/personality concerns for Montero. I could be wrong but I'm just applying some Occam here.1 hour 23 min ago
moethedogMeant to add this: Of course any Montero/McGehee platoon is an odd one, because they are same-sided. But one rips RHP and one rips lefties.3 hours 6 min ago
phxterryCredit Where Credit Is Due Department: Lloyd recognized from the first day that he was hired that the M's atrocious defense in the OF in 2013 needed fixing (thanks Wedgie) and immediately set about getting it fixed, with his brilliant hire of Van Slyke as OF coach. What a difference from last year.3 hours 10 min ago
moethedogMatt: Exactly what I was thinking. With Rios in right and McGehee and Montero platooning at DH we start to field an offense.3 hours 17 min ago
moethedogPhx: I agree. He's here until the M's are done this year. I will be hopeful. rick: I can't see putting Hart anywhere. His last homer was on May 7th. OK, some of that ws on the DL, but he's had 21 starts and 75 AB's w/o one. He did rip 3 doubles in that span, however. In 16 of those 21 starts we've scored 3 runs or less. In 11 we've scored or less. We have to fill his position with somebody who helps. He was a cheap buy. But he hasn't delivered.3 hours 19 min ago
SABR MattAckley is sneaking back into almost respectable ranges now...and is very popular in the clubhouse. It may be they stick with him in LF and get a RFer i trade (Rios) and a smaller piece (DH/UT) like McGehee or Zobrist3 hours 27 min ago
rick82I would put Hart at first (hide the children's eyes if you must), put Montero at DH against all comers, and mix and match LoMo at both positions. Seems obvious to me the M's have decided on LoMo over Smoak after last night, so send him packing in a trade somewhere. If Hart can't handle Miller's, uh, creative throws, then bring up Taylor.3 hours 41 min ago
rick82Over the past 365 days, Ackley's OPS is at .711 - nothing to write home about (unless you play for the Mariners), but when you combine it with a left field defensive rating that is second only to Alex Gordon's for all major leaguers (albeit a very distant second) what you see if a positive contributor. And in fact, Ackley's WAR is now at 0.9 for the season (again, Fangraphs). HIs year long OPS will only rise as we go through August, unless he really tanks, since he had a 1.00+ OPS for the month last season. I think what we have in Ackley is a very streaky hitter, with more down months than positive ones, but his positive ones are very good. He's got an .891 OPS for July so far this season. He's Raul Ibanezish without the power, with the glove.3 hours 48 min ago
SpectatorI think they'll keep their powder dry as far as the 40-man roster goes until after the deadline. Then, if they have the flexibility to do it and still need him, they can add Kelly. And, yes, Montero is hitting his way back onto the team and Hart is hitting his way off of it. But that might not happen until after the deadline either.3 hours 52 min ago
SpectatorRays are now only 5.5 back of M's. So probably forget those blockbuster deals. But I still think there's no chance they stand pat. Needs are too great, and Franklin and the other surplus guys will be too tempting to other teams. Lots more rumors of Mariner pot-stirring than I remember from prior years.3 hours 59 min ago
phxterryMoe - right now the M's, IMO, have to hang on to Ackley and hope he hits like he did the second half of 2013 -- because the team has too many other offensive black holes for which solutions are needed: DH, SS (Miller is lost again), RF, CF (JJ can't buy a hit right now), 1B. Is it possible for Hart to "stub his toe" and go on the 15-day DL and then a rehab assignment in Tacoma?4 hours 10 min ago
phxterryPost-ASB, Ackley, in 21 PAs, has a team leading OPS of 1.143, without any walks. Ackley is doing what he needs to do to improve his batting line - swinging early in the count at pitches in the zone. I know, I know - the usual Ackley SSS tease. However, I'm sure that Billy Beane would love to acquire either Ackley or Franklin when their values are depressed. With his improved defense & his ability to play 2nd base, Ackley represents an intriguing value play for other GMs.4 hours 47 min ago
moethedogrick, herre's the rub on Ackley: We've seen this before. He hits like the 2nd pick in the draft for a bit. But do the M's bet that that bit is for 60 games? In the midst of a WC chase? His last month's production is .323-.364-.419. We will keep him around to see what he continues to bring, I'm sure. Sigh. I wish I was really confident. I hope I'm wrong. But that means that Chavez has to be...must be...expendable, eventually. If we make a move Romero will be the first to head out. But if Saunders gets healthy or we call up Kelly or Montero...then we have to be willing to dump Chavez and Hart.4 hours 48 min ago
moethedogAs I just posted, Montero is our red-headed stepchild. All his faults have become huge and egregious in the eyes of the M's brain trust. Conversely, his one great skill, beating the stuffing out of lefties, has been minimized and is nearly scoffed at. Corey Hart, on the other hand, is a great clubhouse guy (I imagine) who can't field (like Montero) and swings like a rusty gate. Gotta have more of those when you're in the midst of a WC chase, don't you? If we're in on McGehee, then platoon him with Montero at DH. Let's get something out of that position.4 hours 54 min ago
rick82Benihana, Jesus hit a home run late in the second game in the Tacoma night air off a right hander. Check, check, check. What next? Anyone have the post game shower jerk report?5 hours 3 min ago
rick82Someone let me know if Beane makes any move to acquire Dustin Ackley. That would be telling.5 hours 16 min ago