Joe Saunders for ONE Year? Deal me in, buddy

Now let's talk the 10% chance that he's Jamie Moyer


If Saunders is coming in as a 1-year bridge guy, then the entire conversation changes.  Pretty rare, as far as I recall, to get a guy like this to sign with you for a single season.

By "a guy like this" I mean a starting pitcher who:

  • Throws 200 innings every year (194 x 5 the last five years)
  • At a 100 ERA+
  • In the American League
  • Has been apparently getting a little better as time goes on, and was on a hot roll last we saw him
  • In other words, doesn't have warts, isn't coming off surgery, yada yada

I don't like Saunders' .500 SLG against righties, especially with the fences coming in out there in LF.  Still, he was really hot last  fall ... a 58:19 control in the second half, a 2+ ERA in September, and great in the playoffs.  Obviously Buck Showalter saw how hot (not lucky) he was and rode it, slamming him in there against Texas to everybody's amazement -- and having it pay off huge.

So there is the off chance -- 10%, let us say -- that Saunders has pulled a Jamie Moyer at age 31.  As we recall, the M's grabbed Moyer at age 31, 32, right in the middle of Moyer's first "hot" season, and then Moyer pitched like a Hall of Famer for the next 15 years.  Because the M's had body-surfed the very crest of Moyer's emergence, they had pole position and locked him up for the future.

I'd like to ask Zduriencik whether this type of thought is ever in his mind - hey, the upside scenario, he becomes Moyer, you're getting a lotto ticket into the bargain here.  

Saunders will never actually pitch in the style Moyer did; Moyer had ballet-type balance and the best command in the league.  Saunders would have to do it differently.  But some guys get good in their 30's, is the point.


Anyway, two years would have meant committing 60 starts to Saunders - blaarrrggggh ::wipes bottom lip::.  One year means committing zero to him.  Okkayyyyyy.

That gives us three scenarios:

  • LO - Saunders reeks, and you slam the kids in.
  • MID - Saunders has a 100 ERA+, and he acts as a buffer so that you can integrate the glamor rookies on your terms.
  • HI - Saunders does some kind of Jamie Moyer thing, and you reap the benefits.

So the STRATEGIC (not tactical) overview is that --- > you've got a grandmaster play by Zduriencik.  We got no downside here.  We win a pawn in all variations.  Write down the move, screw the Bishop into the square with gusto, and hit the chess clock.


Compared to Jason Vargas, this #4 starter is pretty much a push to me.  Vargas has been a little better, but Saunders did have that hot roll going at the end of 2012 which is a little intriguing.  I call that a push.  As compared to Kevin Millwood, he's pretty clearly a better roll of the dice than that was.  (RIP Kevin and thanks man.  You showed 'em how it was done, brother.)

A ONE year deal on a 100 ERA+ vet who was on a roll when last seen?  No brainer.  I'll take one of those every season until my funeral.


Dr D

Klat Categories: 


Waiting out the off season just paid off big-time!! All the GMZ naysayers who had written off the M's off season as a failure need to hit the re-evaluate button. GMZ now has veteran depth at every position.


I would much rather we just give the ball to Hultzen or Paxton, or both, in mid-May. Much rather......

But this definately kicks Noesi out of the rotation and means Beavan has to fend off those two guys to stay in the rotation. I won't have to watch Noesi and that is of some value.

180 innings/100 ERA+ is something decent to have........especially if the cost is really just one year.

Upside is pretty, downside is he flames out and we are just pitching a guy we already have.

Hultzen or Paxton get to have the full Tacoma experience, for a while. I prefer to think that if they are going to be ready in July they are ready in May....

But one year of Saunders doesn't chap me in any way serious.

A decent get. Must be a bonus or option involved.

Can we cut Raul to open up the 40-man space?



I was leaning that way too. Still in the up scenario if we're looking to possibly keep him long term others have to go. Felix, Kuma, Erasmo, Pax, Hultz, Walker, Beaven, Saunders, Maurer (9, yeah 9!) is just too much for one rotation. In comes Carraway, Sanchez, Fernandez, etc...

Saunders one one year is very laudable. I'm having alot of trouble with a guess on the August 1st rotation though. April 1st seems easier now, but surprises could happen.

I'm going back and forth on the acquisition. It nearly guarantees that even a good spring from one of P/H/M will see them still sent out. There's always injury, trade or collapse to free a spot. Beaven and Ramirez may not be so secure, but I'd rather see both than Saunders. Oh well, depth is much better than dearth.


EA's picture


One thing that being a Mariner fan has taught me is that the real LO scenario is more akin to something like:

Joe has a great Spring
Struggles badly out of the gate
Puts a couple of nice starts together
More stinkers to follow
A nice month gets sprinkled in there mid-season
More stinkers
A few nice starts to end the season after revealing he had mystery elbow pain earlier this year
Contract Extension!
Rinse and Repeat


ghost's picture


although that ws Bavasi...GMZ has yet to do that with any pitcher.


Can I get a wiiittttt-nesssss... 

Can I get a witness... talkin' talkin' bout mah bab-eh


CMB's picture


It's hard to find a player on this roster that isn't playing for a contract or future job.

I love me some numbers, but there's no stat for motivation. Is it April yet?


Right now we got

1 Felix

2 Iwakuma

3 Erasmo (though he'll nominally be the 4)

4 Saunders

5 Paxton

And with any injury to Iwakuma, or whoever, you got Hultzen in next.  Pretty much Zduriencik's ideal -- the BEST of the glamor arms gets the 5 spot, with the runnerup going into the on-deck circle, no rush.


Kelley, Noesi, Triunfel, and a non-40 roster arm for Domonic Brown, please. That would really top off the off-season. Morse, Saunders, and Brown in the outfield, with Guti rotating in against tough lefties. Felix, Kuma, Big Joe, the Eraser, and Bibbedy-Bobbedy Beaven in the rotation until Paxton and Hultzen are safely past super two. Pitchers and Catchers -- REPORT!!


But that does bring it up -- who's next for DFA? I'd sure like a trade rather than just give up Carp, or Wells, or Kelley, or even Noesi or Medina, for nada. We gotta find someone with a player that they'll give up that is worth three or four of our marginal guys. Who else is in a manager's dog house besides Brown that we might want?


ghost's picture


My guess is...we'll finalize the Saunders signing when we finish trading Carp to the Red Sox or some other interested team that whiffed on first base help. Heck...Carp/Kelley is a pretty neat little package to offer someone for a decent prospect or active right fielder with some blemishes.


... disginations for assignment. Everyone who is currently on the 40-man roster will show up and compete. Those who don't make the cut and do not have any more options will get traded to another team for prospects. This is the baseball version of the wheel of life :)


You can make the argument that Saunders is Beavan, from the other side, with one more K and one more BB per 9. And maybe a homerun better every 27 innings.

Something like that.

That's why there isn't a chorus of ringing voices celebrating this deal. 10% upside is quite reasonable. Same might be said about Beavan.

But they are both better than Noesi.

Unless we're a play-off team this year, early Hultzen and Paxton sightings make more sense. remains a decent get. Not much more than that. Unless we roll 7 or 11 on him.



the first pitcher and position player in many decades.. guess we need to get used to using full names because there is more than one Michael too.


I like the suggestion. Not sure how it would work in reality. Some would wait forever to be traded, nobody tangoing with Figgins for the minimum and no talent so far. I think DFA could be severely improved too. There may be something there with spinning the wheel.


jellison's picture


The thought occurred to me, and is noted on another site, in the context of the trade for Morales the acquisition of Saunders is rather interesting. If Vargas and Saunders are viewed as interchangeable (both in performance and salary), and Saunders was available to any team willing to pull the trigger, why did the Angels trade Morales for talent they could have acquired without the loss of Morales? Either (i) the premise of Vargas and Saunders being interchangeable is fundamentally flawed, (ii) the market expectations for Saunders' contract changed dramatically between December and February, or (iii) the Angels made a fundamental strategic error. I would be interested in knowing your thoughts. Did the Mariners just acquire Morales for free?


Very interesting point about acquiring Morales for free. Certainly looks that way to me. A similar point can be raised in the Jaso/Morse/Shoppach deal. If Shoppach is deemed in an overall sense to be the equivalent of Jaso (leaving aside the number of years under contract), did GMZ essentially just acquire Morse for free?


M's Watcher's picture

M's Watcher

I'm just happy that the talk of Noesi in the M's rotation can stop. Saunders mitigates risk with the others in the rotation after Felix, though I'm still hopeful that the kids force their way into the rotation sooner rather than later. Ready or not, they are more talented.


Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <ul> <ol> <li> <i> <b> <img> <table> <tr> <td> <th> <div> <strong> <p> <br> <u>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.


Please log in or create an account to post shouts.
SpectatorAs I said on my site, Landazuri is a long-time "sleeper" favorite of mine. Always pitched above expectations and age level. But after just three starts at AA all the way to the majors? That would be a desperation move, but these are desperate times. He IS next in line on my original "rickroll" depth chart -- at No. 13!2 hours 2 min ago
SABR MattIt doesn't matter how talented the Mariners become...they'll never win more than 87 games again. Ever.5 hours 1 min ago
JDDubThe next couple days have the potential to be tough. #1 fastball velocity Richards shut us down. Eovaldi is #3 and Alvarez #25.6 hours 27 min ago
Bat571And both Miami and Safeco ARE pitcher's parks...7 hours 14 min ago
Bat571Apparently Freddie is in Miami working out with Drew and Morales at Boras' place (although Boras is NOT his agent), so he'd be close to pick up with the bus from the airport.7 hours 16 min ago
Bat571Freddie and Felix back-to-back for a few turns would be fun.7 hours 18 min ago
Bat571On the other hand, if the Chief was ready to go by the Sunday in Miami, I certainly wouldn't mind seeing him make a few starts for the Ms again with a 45-day waiver signed.7 hours 24 min ago
Bat571I knew more about Elias because he was my AAP at MC, but Landazuri's stint at HD (like Fernandez's) gives me some hope he's tough/resilient as well. But his start today really looks like maybe he smells roses...7 hours 31 min ago
Bat571I expect Maurer will pitch the last night in Miami, Felix the first night in Seattle v. Houston, then either Fernandez or Landazuri will start in place of Erasmo on Tues. the 22nd. I can't see them giving Erasmo another start until they figure out what's going on -- either on the DL or in Tacoma. Interestingly, Kevin Slowey, who will pitch for Miami on Sunday, also isn't fully stretched out. Might be a lot of BP action in that one.7 hours 36 min ago
Gordon GrossI love Landazuri. Lots of pitchability, fastball that's "good enough" for a righty but a pitcher, not a hurler. He's more Erasmo than Walker. I don't think he's ready yet, but I wasn't sure Elias was either. I just don't want another Maurer situation. Maurer has loads of potential, and Landazuri doesn't have Brandon's ceiling, but he does have a quality approach. Elias is better at avoiding hits, though, so Landazuri is gonna need a good catcher and gameplan to get as soft a landing as he can. Stephen managed to survive High Desert with his approach and confidence intact - I'm fond of his potential. This would be way soon for his promotion, so just try not to ruin him for a couple starts, OK Mariners?7 hours 43 min ago
Tacoma RainChoi goes off the 40 man, while he is suspended... so we now have options on who can pitch in Miami... be it Landazuri, or Maurer, or Freddie Garcia, or Wolf or trade...7 hours 58 min ago
Bat571And by the way, Blash's HR in the 1st game apparently was off a LH, Austin Kirk.8 hours 25 min ago
Bat571If he can pitch 6.0 IP with 1 hit and 9 Ks in AA, maybe he's not too much farther down than Carraway or Gilheeny (after Maurer gets slotted where Beaven was) to take a start for Erasmo -- or do you think they'll stick with the present 40 and go with Anthony Fernandez?8 hours 27 min ago
Bat571Gordon, Spec, ??, think Landazuri's stuff would hold up for 1 or 2 spot starts until 'Kuma is ready?8 hours 52 min ago
Bat571Looks like Landazuri and Blash both have an interest in the 40-man roster spot.8 hours 54 min ago
GrumpyMan the hits just keep on rolling.8 hours 59 min ago
Gordon GrossARGH... I know that's easy to get in Asia, used for workout routines all the time. If that was part of his offseason bulk up program, that's a BAD idea. *sighs* So he's gone for half the remaining season now. Hope he hits when he gets back, I guess.9 hours 36 min ago
MtGrizzlyCubs fans got nothin' on us.9 hours 42 min ago
JDDubThis franchise is cursed.9 hours 58 min ago
SpectatorOuch re Choi. That's a bad deal.10 hours 34 min ago